Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)

Download scientific diagram | Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b) κ = 0 . 18, (c) κ = 0 . 30. We pick the second as the resultant model because of its good compatibility between weighted mis fi t and solution roughness. The numbers between the triangles in (a) indicate the segments. The white star denotes the epicenter from Harvard CMT solution.  from publication: 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery | Imagery, Imagery (Psychotherapy) and Earthquake | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Improvement on spatial resolution of a coseismic slip distribution using postseismic geodetic data through a viscoelastic inversion, Earth, Planets and Space

3D monitoring of the surface slippage effect on micro-particle sedimentation by digital holographic microscopy

Analysis of coseismic slip distributions and stress variations of the 2019 Mw 6.4 and 7.1 earthquakes in Ridgecrest, California - ScienceDirect

Probing time-dependent afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation following the 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha earthquake based on the 3-D finite-element model, Earth, Planets and Space

Inversion of fault geometry and slip distribution of the 2017 Sarpol‐e

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

Frontiers InSAR coseismic deformation field and seismogenic structure of the 2020 Mw6.0 Jiashi earthquake and the implication for the moderate-magnitude seismicity in the southwestern Tian Shan, western China

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

Rapid and quantitative uncertainty estimation of coseismic slip distribution for large interplate earthquakes using real-time GNSS data and its application to tsunami inundation prediction, Earth, Planets and Space

Origin of the shallow slip deficit on a strike slip fault: Influence of elastic structure, topography, data coverage, and noise - ScienceDirect

Coseismic slip model of the M w 6.4 foreshock of 2019 Ridgecrest